UNIT 11

ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT

Enforcement of judgment is a crucial aspect of civil litigation, ensuring that a court’s decision is implemented and complied with. In Nigeria, the enforcement of judgments is governed by various statutes and rules, including the sheriffs and civil process act (SCPA) and the high court rules of different states. This process involves different methods, depending on the nature of the judgment. The methods of enforcement includes the following:

1. Writ of execution: A writ of execution is a primary tool used to enforce a judgment. It can be issued to enforce various types of judgments, including monetary judgments and orders for possession of property. It includes;
   
   >
   1. Writ of fieri facias (F.F.): This writ directs the sheriff to levy and sell the property of the judgment debtor to satisfy the judgment. See section 32 of the sheriffs and civil process act where the sheriff has the authority to seize and sell the debtor’s property.
   2. Writ of possession: This writ is used to recover possession of land or property. It directs the sheriff to evict occupants and hand over possession to the judgment creditor. See section 51 of the sheriffs and civil process act which provides for the issuance and execution of this writ.
2. Attachment of earnings: This method involves garnishing the judgment debtor’s wages or salary to satisfy the judgment debt. The court issues an order directing the debtor’s employer to deduct a portion of the debtor’s earnings and pay it directly to the judgment creditor. See section 83 of the sheriffs and civil process act.
3. Garnishee proceedings: Garnishee proceedings involve obtaining a court order to seize money held by a third party (the garnishee) on behalf of the judgment debtor. This method is commonly used to recover debts from bank accounts. See order 43 of the federal high court civil procedure rules and similar provisions in other court rules.
4. Execution against the body: This method, also known as "imprisonment in default of payment," allows the court to order the arrest and imprisonment of the debtor until the debt is paid. This remedy is rarely used and is considered a last resort. See section 51 of the sheriffs and civil process act and the case of Eze v. A.C.B. Plc (2002) 4 SC (Pt. 1) 76 which clarified the procedures for the execution of judgments and emphasized the importance of following due process in the enforcement of monetary judgments and also the case of Fola-Alabi v. E.G. (2008) 10 NWLR (Pt. 1095) 184 where the court dealt with the proper application of a writ of possession and the rights of judgment creditors to recover property.

APPLICATIONS PENDING APPEAL

Applications pending appeal are legal procedures that ensure the preservation of the status quo while an appeal is being heard. These applications address urgent issues that arise during the appeal process and are governed by the rules of appellate procedure. The types of applications pending appeal includes the following;

1. Stay of execution: An application for stay of execution seeks to halt the enforcement of a judgment pending the outcome of an appeal. This is crucial to prevent irreparable harm to the appellant. The application must demonstrate that the appellant has a legitimate case and that failing to grant the stay would result in unjust consequences. See order 44 of the federal high court civil procedure rules which provides the framework for applying for a stay of execution.
2. Stay of proceedings: This application seeks to suspend further proceedings in the case until the appeal is determined. It is typically used when continued proceedings could prejudice the appeal or result in a duplication of efforts.
3. Leave to appeal: In some cases, an appellant must seek leave, that is, permission to appeal before the appeal can proceed. This is often required for appeals from interlocutory decisions or when the appeal is not as of right. See section 233 of the constitution of Nigeria which governs the right to appeal and the requirements for obtaining leave in certain situations.
4. Application for security for costs: In appeals, the respondent may apply for security for costs to ensure that the appellant can cover the costs of the appeal if unsuccessful. This application helps protect the respondent from potential financial loss. See the case of Amadi v. Chukwu (2005) 7 NWLR (Pt. 924) 162 where the court discusses the principles guiding the grant of a stay of execution, emphasizing the need for the applicant to show that the appeal has a reasonable chance of success and also the case of Obasohan v. Olufemi (2006) 4 SC (Pt. 1) 116 where the court focuses on the requirements for obtaining a stay of proceedings and the balance of convenience between the parties involved.

CONCLUSION

The enforcement of judgment and applications pending appeal are essential aspects of civil litigation that ensure the effective resolution of disputes and protect the rights of parties during the appeal process. Understanding the methods of enforcement and the procedures for making applications pending appeal is crucial for navigating the legal system effectively in Nigeria.