LAND LAW
UNIT 4
NATURE OF CUSTOMARY TENANCY
Customary tenancy refers to the traditional practice where a landowner (the grantor) allows another person (the tenant) to occupy and use the land according to local customs and traditions. This type of tenancy is recognized under customary law, which varies among different ethnic groups in Nigeria. Customary tenancies are typically not documented formally, relying instead on oral agreements and communal recognition. Customary tenancies usually arise from an agreement, either express or implied, where the landowner grants the tenant the right to use the land in return for a token payment, tribute, or other forms of acknowledgment. The nature of these agreements is often influenced by local customs, which dictate the terms and conditions of the tenancy.
RIGHTS OF THE CUSTOMARY TENANT
DUTIES OF THE CUSTOMARY TENANT
DETERMINATION OF CUSTOMARY TENANCY
Customary tenancy can be terminated through several means:
RELIEF AGAINST FORFEITURE
Relief against forfeiture is a legal remedy that allows a tenant to apply to the court to set aside a forfeiture order. This remedy is typically sought when a tenant has breached a term of the tenancy but believes that forfeiture is an excessive penalty. Under Nigerian law, the courts can grant relief against forfeiture if the tenant can demonstrate that the breach was not willful, and they are willing to rectify the breach and comply with the tenancy terms moving forward. This principle is recognized under both customary law and statutory law, such as the Land Use Act. See the case of Onwudinjo v. Dimobi (1956) 1 FSC 51 which illustrates the principles of relief against forfeiture under customary tenancy and the court held that a tenant could be granted relief if they rectify the breach and continue to adhere to the terms of the tenancy.
IMPACT OF LAND USE ACT ON CUSTOMARY TENANCY
The Land Use Act of 1978 significantly reformed land tenure in Nigeria. It vests all land in a state governor, who holds it in trust for the people. See sections 1 and 36 of the Land Use Act 1978 which are particularly relevant to the administration and control of land under the Act and the case of Abioye v. Yakubu (1991) 5 NWLR (Pt. 190) 130 which discussed the implications of the Land Use Act on customary land tenure and the rights of customary tenants.
This act has had several impacts on customary tenancies that includes the following:
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, customary tenancy remains a vital aspect of land tenure in Nigeria, though its practice has been significantly influenced by statutory reforms such as the Land Use Act. Understanding the rights and duties of customary tenants, along with the mechanisms for the determination of tenancies and relief against forfeiture, is essential for navigating the complexities of customary and statutory land laws in Nigeria.